3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Coyne v. Milan Police Pension Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coyne v. Milan Police Pension Board Anchor | green | “factual findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence only where 'it is clearly evident the agency erred and should have reached the opposite conclusion.” | 5 |
| 2 | BD. OF EDUC. OF ROUND LAKE AREA SCHOOLS v. State Bd. of Educ. | green | “factual findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence only where 'it is clearly evident the agency erred and should have reached the opposite conclusion.” | 3 |
| 3 | BD. OF EDUC. OF ROUND LAKE AREA SCHOOLS v. State Bd. of Educ. | green | “it is clearly evident the agency erred and should have reached the opposite conclusion.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.