3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. State Anchor | green | “an instruction which correctly sets forth the elements of attempted murder requires an explanation that the act must have been done with the specific intent to kill.” | 4 |
| 2 | Smith v. State | green | “the act must have been done with the specific intent to kill.” | 3 |
| 3 | Taylor v. State | green | “spradlin effectively overruled king v. state (1988), ind., 517 n.e.2d 383 ; worley v. state (1986), ind., 501 n.e.2d 406 ; santana, 486 n.e.2d 1010 ; and other prior cases contrary to spradlin.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.