2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thornton v. GARCINI.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thornton v. GARCINI Anchor | green | “the absence of medical testimony does not preclude recovery for emotional distress.” | 6 |
| 2 | Klingelhoets v. Charlton-Perrin | green | “should not be ordered if the award falls within the flexible range of conclusions which can reasonably be supported by the facts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.