2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Canel v. Topinka.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Canel v. Topinka Anchor | green | “whether the allegations of the complaint, when viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted.” | 6 |
| 2 | Seip v. Rogers Raw Materials Fund, L.P. | green | “whether the allegations of the complaint, when viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, are sufficient to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.