3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Snyder v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP., BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Snyder v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP., BUREAU OF MOTOR VEHICLES Anchor | green | “substantial evidence is defined as relevant evidence that a reasonable mind, without weighing the evidence or substituting its judgment for that of the fact finder, might accept as adequate to support the conclusion reached.” | 3 |
| 2 | McCarthy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation | green | “is limited to determining whether the trial court committed an error of law or whether the trial court's findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 3 |
| 3 | Firestone Tire & Service Center, O.I.S. 798 v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation | green | “in cases involving alleged violations of the code and the regulations interpreting the same, the department has the burden of proving such violations by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.