3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry Anchor | green | “presumptive evidence of his residence for voting purposes” | 3 |
| 2 | Engel v. Board of Elections | green | “procedure had not been followed at the time the designating petition was filed, no cancellation of olivencia's registration occurred and thus the designating petition was not invalid for that reason,” | 3 |
| 3 | Engel v. Board of Elections | green | “specifically provides that no such cancellation may occur until the voter is notified by the board of its intention to cancel and given an opportunity to be heard” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.