3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Marriage of Scafuri.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Marriage of Scafuri Anchor | green | “in setting child support around where the parties agreed when the minor would be emancipating in a few months.” | 3 |
| 2 | Pepper Hardy v. Richard Fink | green | “as evidenced by the various amendments to the initial ctc and the accompanying legislator's comments about those changes, the intent of the legislature when modifying the actc was to benefit low-income families.” | 3 |
| 3 | Pepper Hardy v. Richard Fink | green | “reduce the individual income tax burden on families with dependent children, to better recognize the financial responsibilities of raising dependent children, and to promote family values.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.