3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Sylvain.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Sylvain Anchor | green | “objectively reasonable for an officer to entertain a suspicion that a driver may be impaired by ... alcohol” | 3 |
| 2 | Grover v. Boise Cascade Corp. | green | “cause the pro spective jurors to adopt a position on the law without the benefit of the court's instructions, and without reference to the jurors' duty.to apply the law as instructed and not as each juror saw fit,” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. King | green | “the only requirement we have imposed on the reasonable articulable, suspicion standard is that an officer's suspicion be more than mere, speculation or an unsubstantiated hunch.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.