2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc. Anchor | green | “cannot contradict an express contractual term, nor otherwise provide a remedy for an unpleasantly motivated act that is expressly permitted by the contract.” | 5 |
| 2 | Klamath Off-Project Water Users, Inc. v. PacifiCorp | green | “is to prohibit improper behavior in the performance and enforcement of contracts, and to ensure that the parties 'will refrain from any act that would have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.