3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shakir.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shakir Anchor | green | “requires an attorney to provide competent representation to his/her client by applying the appropriate knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation to the client's issues.” | 4 |
| 2 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCulloch | green | “evidence of a failure to apply the requisite thoroughness and/or preparation in representing a client is sufficient alone to support a violation of rule 1.1.” | 3 |
| 3 | Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCulloch | green | “to apply the requisite thoroughness and/or preparation in representing a client is sufficient alone to support a violation of rule 1.1.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.