2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Maine v. Karl Maine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Maine v. Karl Maine Anchor | green | “a court abuses its discretion in ruling on evidentiary issues if the ruling arises from a failure to apply principles of law applicable to a situation resulting in prejudice.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. Grigsby | green | “as to a range of the level of grigs-by's blood-alcohol at the time of the arrest,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.