2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keystone Masonry, Inc. v. Garco Construction, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keystone Masonry, Inc. v. Garco Construction, Inc. Anchor | green | “absent disputed facts, the legal effect of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo.” | 5 |
| 2 | Keystone Masonry, Inc. v. GARCO CONST. | green | “absent disputed facts, the legal effect of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.