2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Affum v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Affum v. United States Anchor | green | “under the applicable standard of review, the secretary abuses his discretion in his choice of a penalty if his decision is either 'unwarranted in law' or 'without justification in fact'....” | 3 |
| 2 | Castillo v. United States | green | “all four of these criteria must be satisfied in order to impose a .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.