3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Bowen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Bowen Anchor | green | “because the statutory language of both the public defender and state's attorney records automation fees is identical except for the name of the organization, we find no reason to distinguish between the two statutes, and conclude both charges constitute fees which were properly …” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Black | green | “possessed a degree of knowledge or sophistication that excused the lack of admonition.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Rivera | green | “because the statutory language of both the public defender and state's attorney records automation fees is identical except for the name of the organization, we find no reason to distinguish between the two statutes, and conclude both charges constitute fees which were properly …” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.