2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Allen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Allen Anchor | green | “motions for reconsideration are not to be used as 'a vehicle for a party to undo its own procedural failures allow a party to advance arguments that could and should have been presented to the district court prior to judgment.” | 3 |
| 2 | Estate of Rivera v. Doctor Susoni Hospital Inc. | green | “will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked and that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.