3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Matter of Iasha Tameeka McL. (Herbert McL.).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Matter of Iasha Tameeka McL. (Herbert McL.) Anchor | green | “by neither acknowledging nor meaningfully addressing the conditions that led to the children's removal in the first instance, namely, the underlying sexual abuse of another older daughter” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Febles | green | “developing an appropriate service plan tailored to the situation, regularly updating the father on the children's progress and continually reminding him to comply with the requirements of the service plan” | 3 |
| 3 | Perea v. Sanchez | green | “there is no indication that the court considered, credited, or relied upon inadmissible hearsay in reaching its determination” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.