2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. Anchor | green | “his court strives to reach a claim construction that does not render claim language in dependent claims meaningless.” | 3 |
| 2 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. And Dow Corning Corp. (Formerly Dow Corning Wright Corp.) v. Osteonics Corporation | green | “e must not interpret an independent claim in a way that is inconsistent with a claim which depends from it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.