2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Richard v. Regional School Unit 57.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard v. Regional School Unit 57 Anchor | green | “expressly respond like a debate champion to every evidentiary or factual contention made by the losing side.” | 5 |
| 2 | Rivera v. Kirby Offshr Mrne | green | “findings of fact and conclusions of law must be 'sufficient in detail and exactness to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate conclusion reached,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.