6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 84 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arthur Whitehead v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arthur Whitehead v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr Anchor | green | “a finding of no substantial evidence is appropriate only if no credible evidentiary choices or medical findings support the decision.” | 21 |
| 2 | Uwe Taylor v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner | green | “is exceedingly deferential and limited to two inquiries: whether substantial evidence supports the alj's decision, and whether the alj applied the proper legal standards when evaluating the evidence.” | 18 |
| 3 | Perez v. Barnhart | green | “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 15 |
| 4 | Perez v. Barnhart | green | “reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for the commissioner's.” | 13 |
| 5 | Arthur Whitehead v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr | green | “is appropriate only if no credible evidentiary choices or medical findings support the decision.” | 12 |
| 6 | Myers v. Apfel | green | “is an assessment of an individual's ability to do sustained work-related physical and mental activities in a work setting on a regular and continuing basis.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.