2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beauchamp v. City of New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beauchamp v. City of New York Anchor | green | “an employee's actions fall within the scope of employment where the purpose in performing such actions is 'to further the employer's interest, or to carry out duties incumbent upon the employee in furthering the employer's business” | 5 |
| 2 | Pinto v. Tenenbaum | green | “an act is considered to be within the scope of employment if it is performed while the employee is engaged generally in the business of the employer, or if the act may be reasonably said to be necessary or incidental to such employment” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.