3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thurman v. United Health Services Hospitals, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thurman v. United Health Services Hospitals, Inc. Anchor | green | “could not have reasonably believed that he was receiving medical care from the hospital in general rather than from a particular physician” | 3 |
| 2 | Helper v. Chapin | green | “to establish, through competent expert medical opinion evidence, that there exists a triable issue of fact as to whether there was a deviation from the accepted standard of care and whether there exists a causal nexus between that deviation and decedent's injuries” | 3 |
| 3 | Citron v. Northern Dutchess Hospital | green | “a hospital may face vicarious liability for the acts of independent physicians if the patient enters the hospital through the emergency room and seeks treatment from the hospital, not from a particular physician” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.