2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from American Association of Commodity Traders v. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Association of Commodity Traders v. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America Anchor | green | “not clear that every loss of potential help from a bureaucrat is a loss of a constitutional interest” | 3 |
| 2 | Vasquez v. City of Hamtramck | green | “a citizen does not suffer a constitutional deprivation every time he is subjected to the petty harassment of a state agent” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.