3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David WW. v. Laureen QQ..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David WW. v. Laureen QQ. Anchor | green | “our authority in determinations of custody is as broad as that of family court” | 3 |
| 2 | Walters v. Francisco | green | “afford the mother every favorable inference that could be reasonably drawn” | 3 |
| 3 | Walters v. Francisco | green | “where, as here, 'a respondent moves to dismiss a modification proceeding at the conclusion of the petitioner's proof, the court must accept as true the petitioner's proof and afford the petitioner every favorable inference that could be reasonably drawn therefrom” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.