5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 84 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc. Anchor | green | “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” | 41 |
| 2 | Robert P. Coyne v. City of Somerville | green | “the well-pleaded facts as they appear in the complaint, extending the plaintiff every reasonable inference in his favor.” | 16 |
| 3 | Kevin Monahan v. Dorchester Counseling Center, Inc. | green | “take the allegations in the complaint as true and grant all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” | 14 |
| 4 | Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc. | green | “only if 'it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” | 9 |
| 5 | Maldonado v. Dominguez | green | “we do not interpret the pslra standard to differ from that which this court has historically applied.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.