3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sloan v. Bruyere.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sloan v. Bruyere Anchor | green | “advocates either expressly or by clear implication, violence based upon race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, creed, law enforcement status or violence or acts of disobedience against department employees or that could facilitate organizational activity within the institution” | 3 |
| 2 | Moustakos v. State | green | “it is well settled that, where, as here, the actions of correction personnel have violated the due process safeguards contained in 7 nycrr parts 252 through 254, those actions 'will not receive immunity” | 3 |
| 3 | Moustakos v. State | green | “would have . . . changed the outcome of the hearing” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.