3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yaroma v. Cashcall, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yaroma v. Cashcall, Inc. Anchor | green | “in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, 'courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment.” | 3 |
| 2 | Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc. | green | “in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, 'courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment.” | 3 |
| 3 | Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc. | green | “therefore, the party opposing arbitration bears the burden of 'showing a genuine issue of material fact as to the validity of the agreement to arbitrate.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.