2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Nolasco-Rosas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Nolasco-Rosas Anchor | green | “we do not consider whether the jury correctly determined innocence or guilt, but whether the jury made a rational decision.” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Yudeluis Jimenez-Elvirez | green | “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and draw all reasonable inferences from the evidence to support the verdict.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.