2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Buckingham v. SECRETARY OF US DEPT. OF AGR..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buckingham v. SECRETARY OF US DEPT. OF AGR. Anchor | green | “highly deferential, presuming the agency action to be valid.” | 4 |
| 2 | Gardner v. United States Bureau of Land Management | green | “considered the relevant factors and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choices made.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.