2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v. Ragland Anchor | green | “official scrutiny of the content of publications as the basis for imposing a tax is entirely incompatible with the first amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press” | 5 |
| 2 | Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue | green | “we have long recognized that even regulations aimed at proper governmental concerns can restrict unduly the exercise of rights protected by the first amendment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.