2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. Anchor | green | “because the false claims act is self-evidently an anti-fraud statute, complaints brought under it must comply with rule 9(b).” | 4 |
| 2 | United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp. | green | “designed to prevent those who make false records or statements to get claims paid or approved from escaping liability solely on the ground that they did not themselves present a claim for payment or approval.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.