2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp. Anchor | green | “the critical question concerning fitness for review is whether the claim involves uncertain and contingent events that may not occur as anticipated or may not occur at all.” | 5 |
| 2 | Roman Catholic Bishop v. City of Springfield | green | “the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.