5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 83 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edwards v. Sullivan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edwards v. Sullivan Anchor | green | “the evidence preponderates against” | 56 |
| 2 | B. B. On Behalf of A. L. B. v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “great respect and deference, if the underlying statute is unclear and the legislative history offers no guidance.” | 9 |
| 3 | Juanda K. Adams v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “there is no rigid requirement that the alj specifically refer to every piece of evidence in his decision, so long as the alj's decision enables the district court to conclude that the alj considered the claimant's medical condition as a whole.” | 8 |
| 4 | Angela Moreno v. Comm. Michael J. Astrue | green | “(1) the claimant's daily activities; (2) the nature and intensity of pain and other symptoms; (3) precipitating and aggravating factors; (4) effects of medications; (5) treatment or measures taken by the claimant for relief of symptoms; and other factors concerning functional li…” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.