2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United States Anchor | green | “applying anew the same standard used by the cit.” | 4 |
| 2 | Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States | green | “although such review amounts to repeating the work of the cit, we have noted that 'this court will not ignore the informed opinion of the cit.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.