2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., Defendants.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., Defendants Anchor | green | “continued need for the same services and skills.” | 5 |
| 2 | Dawn M. Cochrane v. William Quattrocchi | green | “the benefit of all inferences which the evidence fairly supports, even though contrary inferences might reasonably be drawn.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.