3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 83 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products Company Anchor | green | “the mere allegation that plaintiff was injured by all defendants is not sufficient to join unrelated parties as defendants in the same lawsuit pursuant to rule 20(a),” | 36 |
| 2 | Kalie v. Bank of America Corp. | green | “look to the logical relationship between the claims and determine 'whether the essential facts of the various claims are so logically connected that considerations of judicial economy and fairness dictate that all the issues be resolved in one lawsuit.” | 36 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.