2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Paul Laxalt v. C.K. McClatchy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paul Laxalt v. C.K. McClatchy Anchor | green | “replaces the usual discovery standards of the frcp . . . with a different and higher standard.” | 4 |
| 2 | Clavir v. United States | green | “cannot be used to block the normal course of court proceedings, including court-ordered discovery.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.