2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital Anchor | green | “if the law were otherwise, many a physician's workplace grievance with a hospital would be elevated to the status of an antitrust action.” | 5 |
| 2 | Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co. | green | “there must be evidence of 'demonstrable economic effect' not just an inference of possible effect.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.