2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a Corporation Anchor | green | “thus the defendant cannot cause a transfer to federal court simply by asserting a federal question in his responsive pleading.” | 5 |
| 2 | Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker Company | green | “therefore, a federal court may, in some situations, look beyond the face of the complaint to determine whether a plaintiff has artfully pleaded his suit so as to couch a federal claim in terms of state law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.