2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Randolph Parsad v. Charles Greiner, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Randolph Parsad v. Charles Greiner, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of New York Anchor | green | “based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding.” | 4 |
| 2 | Richard S. v. Carpinello | green | “a state-court decision . . . involves an unreasonable application of supreme court precedent if the state court either unreasonably extends a legal principle from supreme court precedent to a new context where it should not apply or unreasonably refuses to extend that principle …” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.