2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morris v. Maks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morris v. Maks Anchor | green | “isp agrees and consents that the exclusive jurisdiction and venue for any dispute between the parties to this agreement shall be limited to a local, state or federal court situated within the city of spokane and/or spokane county, washington.” | 4 |
| 2 | In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Starczewski | green | “a court only considers legal arguments supported by citation to legal authority.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.