2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mintle v. Mintle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mintle v. Mintle Anchor | green | “judicial discretion is a composite of many things, among which are conclusions drawn from objective criteria.” | 4 |
| 2 | Matter of the Adoption of BGH | green | “in determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion, the ultimate issue is whether the court could reasonably have concluded as it did.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.