2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gussin v. Gussin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gussin v. Gussin Anchor | green | “wide discretion upon the family court.” | 5 |
| 2 | Tougas v. Tougas | green | “alter the ultimate distribution of marital partnership property based on the respective separate conditions of the spouses.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.