2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Negley v. Massey Ferguson, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negley v. Massey Ferguson, Inc. Anchor | green | “the extent and nature of the subrogation rights of an employer under the workmen's compensation statutes are matters for legislative determination.” | 6 |
| 2 | Maas v. Huxtable & Associates, Inc. | green | “furthermore, workers compensation statutes should be liberally construed in favor of the worker if such construction is compatible with legislative intent.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.