2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Campuzano-Burgos v. Midland Credit Management., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campuzano-Burgos v. Midland Credit Management., Inc. Anchor | green | “gives effect to the act's intent to 'protect the gullible as well as the shrewd.” | 4 |
| 2 | Pollard v. Law Office of Mandy L. Spaulding | green | “we apply an objective test based on the understanding of the 'least sophisticated consumer' in determining whether a collection letter violates section 1692e.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.