2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Arias-Ordonez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Arias-Ordonez Anchor | green | “limiting review to the procedural requirements for reinstatement without regard to the soundness of the underlying removal proceeding implicates due process concerns by effectively foreclosing all opportunity for 'meaningful' review of the underlying removal,” | 4 |
| 2 | Wendy Osorio Martinez v. Attorney General United States | green | “the lawful permanent resident is the quintessential example of an alien entitled to broad constitutional protections.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.