6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Emerson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Emerson Anchor | green | “the fourth amendment to the united states constitution and the ohio constitution, article i, section 14, prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures.” | 40 |
| 2 | State v. Codeluppi | green | “appellate review of a motion to suppress presents a mixed question of law and fact.” | 20 |
| 3 | State v. Dorsey | green | “once a defendant demonstrates that he or she was subjected to a warrantless search or seizure, the burden shifts to the state to establish that the warrantless search or seizure was constitutionally permissible.” | 9 |
| 4 | State v. Codeluppi | green | “normally, appellate review of a motion to suppress presents a mixed question of law and fact.” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Koczwara | green | “a traffic stop with the proper standard of evidence is valid regardless of the officer's underlying ulterior motives as the test is merely whether the officer 'could' have performed the act complained of; pretext is irrelevant if the action complained of was permissible.” | 4 |
| 6 | State v. Petty | green | “searches and seizures conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the fourth amendment-subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.