2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re of the Tax Appeal of Maile Sky Court Co. v. City & County of Honolulu.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re of the Tax Appeal of Maile Sky Court Co. v. City & County of Honolulu Anchor | green | “the interpretation of a statute is a question of law.” | 4 |
| 2 | Tax Appeal of Weinberg Ex Rel. WKH Corp. v. City & County of Honolulu | green | “the interpretation of a statute is a question of law.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.