2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tracey Lust v. Sealy, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tracey Lust v. Sealy, Inc. Anchor | green | “the formula was (obviously) not intended to be taken literally.” | 3 |
| 2 | Maria N. Gracia v. SigmaTron International, Inc. | green | “we must assess the repre- hensibility of conduct by viewing the facts as the jury found them.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.