2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. McDonald.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. McDonald Anchor | green | “for clear error the district court's factual findings underlying the imposition of a sentencing enhancement based on the defendant's role in the offense,” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Garcia | green | “sentencing judges are only required to find sentence-enhancing facts by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.