2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Simms v. Acevedo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simms v. Acevedo Anchor | green | “extraordinary circumstances beyond his control stood in the way of the timely filing of his petition.” | 4 |
| 2 | Teas v. Endicott | green | “nothing in 2244(d) implies that the time is reopened if the state court engages in multiple rounds of review that it calls 'direct.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.